Monday, April 15, 2013
By April 19, 2013, MasterCard expects the U.S. ATM industry to have its ATMs configured to accept non-U.S.-issued and EMV-enabled MasterCard Worldwide branded Maestro cards. For ATM operators that do not have their ATMs properly configured to accept the cards by the fast approaching deadline, a liability shift will occur where those ATM operators will be responsible for any fraud that occurs on those cards when non-EMV-compliant machines are involved.
It is one early deadline for the entire payments industry's road map to full compliance with the EMV standard by Oct. 1, 2016, as imposed by MasterCard. (Visa Inc. has a slightly different timeline.)
NAC, which represents independent U.S. ATM providers, has been working with MasterCard to facilitate the transition to EMV. The companies said in a joint statement that they had reached "a balanced and workable arrangement that should support the U.S. ATM industry in managing the liability shift program." Specifically, the dialogue resulted in MasterCard taking the following steps:
In February 2012, ATM operators represented by NAC requested MasterCard give them more time to reach EMV compliance before imposition of the liability shift. The operators pointed out that technical issues pertaining to EMV deployment in the United States are still unresolved. They also said they need more time to transition the more than 425,000 ATMs in the United States to the EMV standard.
NAC and MasterCard said the point of the liability shift program is to prevent fraud by implementing EMV at all POS devices, including ATMs. At the same time, payment businesses are given the choice about "whether, when and how to implement EMV technology," the organizations noted.
The program has been undertaken for the apparent good of the entire payments industry. "All of this is being done with an eye toward a broader migration – and to more effectively and comprehensively prevent fraud – over the next few years," the organizations said. "Together, we will continue to deliver consumers the reliable and secure access to their money they have come to expect over the past 45+ years, in this instance through ATMs."
But doubts persist. In a Feb. 11, 2013, Atlanta Federal Reserve blog post, Douglas King, a Payments Risk Expert in the Retail Payments Risk Forum at the Atlanta Fed, said he has reservations about the push to EMV in the United States largely because it does not address card-not-present (CNP) fraud. "CNP fraud continues to rise because EMV does not effectively prevent it in today's online environment," he said.
King stated that EMV only addresses part of the fraud problem. "Until a cost-effective and consumer-friendly CNP fraud reduction solution gains traction, I believe a business case for EMV built around fraud losses will remain difficult to build," he added.
Editor's Note:
The Green Sheet Inc. is now a proud affiliate of Bankcard Life, a premier community that provides industry-leading training and resources for payment professionals. Click here for more information.
Notice to readers: These are archived articles. Contact names or information may be out of date. We regret any inconvenience.