The Green Sheet Online Edition

December 12, 2008 • 08:12:02

Legal ease

The law of fine print

Like many businesses, credit card acquiring and issuing depend on fine print. And once in a while those finely printed terms and conditions are scrutinized by the courts. Such was the case in Lonner v. Simon Prop. Group Inc. (2008 NY Slip OP 07877), which was decided by the Appellate Division of the New York Supreme Court on Oct. 14, 2008.

In this case, the court was asked to decide whether a $2.50 monthly inactivity fee on a gift card was permissible since it was disclosed only in fine print at the time of the card's issuance. The court held that the fee was not permissible due to failure by the issuer to adequately disclose the fee in the terms and conditions distributed to cardholders.

The purpose of this article is to draw some important lessons from the ruling that could help you, as ISOs and merchant level salespeople (MLSs), stay on the right side of the law. Please note that this was a New York State case; the findings may not apply in your state or to your particular situation.

The facts

First I will quote from the judgment:

The law

The New York statute governing fine print (CPLR 4544) reads as follows:

The court went beyond the letter of the law and provided an educational summary of consumer protection laws and the way in which they should be interpreted. The court quoted an earlier judgment on fine print; following are some excerpts:

skyscraper ad