Driver's Licenses and Personal
Information
As you know, the driver's license has been a stable ID for the
Check Guarantee Industry for over 30 years. Over the last few years,
SCAN, as the industry's leading Verification company, has moved low
ticket, high volume retailers toward MICR numbers (your account
number and bank routing information) as an alternative ID due to
speed of entry. Today many states are operating some very aggressive
initiatives to make your driver's license as easily read by a
point-of-sale terminal as a credit card, and with a great deal more
information.
Fifteen states are already issuing driver's licenses with either
magnetic strips or one- or two-dimensional bar codes which contain
valuable marketing information. But merchants are leery of scanning
this information and using it in their marketing efforts. Why?
There are a variety of reasons why merchants are dragging their
heels, including the high cost of magnetic strip readers and lack of
national standards for the strips. There is also the growing fear of
identity theft and privacy issues which may be keeping merchants at
arm's length for fear of alienating the consumer.
Is this really new information?
No, the data on the driver's license and it's availability really
isn't anything new-this data has been out there for a long time and
anyone could access it. It's just a little easier now and the
consumer is providing it directly, rather than through a commercial
entity.
Is anyone studying privacy information and the public's access to
it? Yes, a report completed in March 1997 by the Board of Governors
of the Federal Reserve to Congress addressed the availability of
consumer identifying information and financial fraud. The study
focused on the availability of "sensitive" information which
identifies consumers.
The report found that while it's true that information about a
consumer has value, that value is dependent on two things:
1. How descriptive the data is.
2. How the data can be used.
The more descriptive or unique a piece of data is, the more useful
and valuable it becomes. For example, a Social Security Number in
itself doesn't say much about a consumer, it is not descriptive. But,
that number can be used to obtain other personal identifying
information. Therefore, it has the potential of increased value and
increased misuse.
The information industry, which is comprised of government
entities, direct marketers, and reference services, has grown rapidly
with the advent of on-line services because all three entities can
now gather and distribute information quickly. Information which is
gathered for one reason, such as the sale of a house, can be sold for
something else, such as to a vendor of household products.
This is an example of how the value of a piece of information can
be increased by combining it with other information. Why is this
information so valuable? According to a 1996 Poll by the Gallup
Organization, 77 percent of U.S. commercial firms use direct
marketing, and so does the government.
Government
Does this sound strange- that the government would provide (either
free or for a fee) information about you to a commercial entity?
Well, take a look at some examples of items in the Public
Record:
- Driver's License & Driving Record
- Marriage & Divorce Record
- Motor Vehicle/Title Registrations
- Court and Law Enforcement Records
- Postal Service Records
- Vital Statistics
- Voter Registration Records
- Property Tax Records
- Filings with the Securities and Exchange Commission
- Financial and Ethics Disclosures
- Occupational and Recreational licenses
These records provide extensive information about a consumer,
including race, gender, date of birth, date of marriage or divorce,
place of business, assets, price of mortgage, etc. All of this data
can be obtained via magnetic tape, in person, telephone, fax, and
Internet from the government, a reference service, or a consumer
reporting agency.
Although The Driver's Privacy Protection Act of 1994 goes
into effect in September of this year, much of the information it is
to protect is already public record somewhere else. The Act is loaded
with exceptions to when DMV information is protected, so it doesn't
seem information is protected at all. For example, data can be
released by the DMV when it is:
- Needed for legal, safety, or insurance issues
- Requested by private investigators or researchers
- Requested by a government agency
- To be used in the normal course of business to verify or
update personal information
Reference services
What is a reference service? A reference service offers one stop
shopping for anyone looking for information on someone else. Internet
reference services can provide virtual dossiers, including name, date
of birth, Social Security Number, aliases, current and previous
addresses, telephone number, family members, addresses of relative
and neighbors, vehicle registration, and can be sold to anyone
because it all comes from the public record.
Consumer Reporting Agencies
Consumer Reporting Agencies (CRAs) also called Credit Bureaus,
have been getting a lot of negative publicity lately about invading
privacy. They often have information about a person's financial life
including employer, credit and loan account numbers, amount of
available credit, amount of outstanding debt, payment history,
default, judgments, and bankruptcy information. Under the Fair Credit
Reporting Act these agencies are prohibited from disclosing this
information to anyone without a permissible purpose.
Big sigh of relief, yes? Well, hold your breath because consumer
reports contain "header information" which is not restricted. This
information includes name, current and previous addresses, aliases,
and, yes, the old Social Security Number, the number with which
almost anything is possible.
Consumer agencies can sell this information and there aren't any
laws to regulate how and to whom the information is provided (unlike
the financial information contained in a consumer report.) Merge this
with the information in public records and you have a pretty complete
profile, although it may take some work.
While amendments made to the Fair Credit Reporting Act in 1996
will go into effect in September, some say the law may actually
weaken consumers' protection because it prohibits federal agencies
from examining whether banks, savings associations, and credit unions
have complied with the law.
Questions and debate
Some of the questions around publicly available data and the risk
of fraud arise because there is not a consensus on what is
"sensitive" information.
Some define it to be Social Security Number, Mother's Maiden Name,
Prior Address, and Date of Birth. Others think it should also include
Place of Birth, Names of Family Members, Names of Schools Attended,
Telephone Numbers (both listed and unlisted), Past and Present
Employment Information, Medical Records, Voter Registration
Information, Passport Number, Driver's License Number, Car
Registration, Loan and Credit Card Numbers, PINs, and Insurance
Policy Numbers.
Still others don't think information such as Social security
Number should be considered "sensitive" because it appears on all
sorts of documents, including driver's licenses, and is therefore
shown to merchants all the time as ID.
In their study, the Federal Reserve defined "sensitive" as "that
which is most commonly used to commit financial fraud." Those items
most often include Social Security Number, Mother's Maiden Name,
Prior Address, Date of Birth, Employment Information (including
salary), and Credit Card, Loan and Financial Account Numbers.
The main reason these items were identified as "used to commit
financial fraud" is because of the ease of which additional pieces of
information can be obtained when initially just one piece of
information is known.
What this proves is that the information on licenses and mag
strips which people may be up in arms about, and what may be
preventing merchants from using it for marketing efforts, already
exists and is widely available from a variety of sources such as
government and commercial services. There are few legal constraints
currently in place regarding the collection, use, and dissemination
of information and the study by the Federal Reserve found that
"losses attributed to identity theft do not pose a significant risk
to insured depository institutions."
[Go Back]