Year
2000
If you're like me,
you're getting weary of stories about Year 2000 problems. In fact, I
have provided several different perspectives on the issue, including
Visa/MasterCard issuing concerns, fines for ISOs and banks who do not
complete terminal upgrades by certain dates, and even ideas about how
to check out your own PC. However, I must admit that the material I
received this week from Year 2000 Compliance Institute and
Microbanker in Lake George, New York, is scary. According to
Microbanker, "The Year 2000 will cause over 10% of financial
institutions to fail," because they will not be prepared to handle
the new date in their software.
We hear about the
problems of Year 2000 daily. Usually they involve errors in card
readers, or mistakes in billing; problems which are inconvenient and
costly. Therefore, companies are spending millions of dollars NOW
hoping to prevent the costs later. According to Computer World
Magazine, Fortune 500 companies will spend $50 to $100 million EACH
on Year 2000 fixes.
Part of the reason for
such high dollar figures is that many companies are "killing two
birds with one stone," and using this opportunity to purchase new
systems. Another reason for the high price tag is that problems
aren't confined to "in house" systems. Many companies have
computer-controlled elevators, telephone, and security systems. Many
are operated by contractors, which means there has to be some
coordination and communication, which raises the costs.
Additionally, it's not
just the "big" systems that are at risk. The Year 2000 bugs trickle
down to each individual PC and application. According to Rob Reeg,
senior vice president for systems development at MasterCard,
MasterCard is investigating how individual workers have modified
their own programs and databases that may prove
problematic.
Even though companies
are preparing for 2000 in hopes that it will be a seamless transition
for the public, this spending is not without risk to the public. In
that vein, the SEC has issued an advisory stating that public
companies should disclose their year 2000 spending if it will have an
impact on the company's financial status, products, or
competitiveness.
[Return]