Page 40 - GS160802
P. 40

CoverStory

                     To PIN or not to PIN?                                    and stopped 112 million attacks among 5.2 billion
                                                                              transactions processed, representing a 50 percent increase
            While many experts agree widespread adoption of EMV               over the same period in 2015.
            technology combats fraud, there has been significant
            disagreement on how best to implement EMV: as a chip-and-         One attack plan is not enough
            PIN or a chip-and-signature solution. In most countries where
            EMV has taken hold PIN is the dominant authorization method;      It is essential to find the right automated tools, and
            not so in the U.S., where many retailers remain frustrated.       combinations of tools, that can help merchants more
                                                                              efficiently and effectively identify fraud. CyberSource's
            Retailing giant Wal-Mart Stores Inc. has gone so far as to sue    data revealed that merchants use combinations of tools
            Visa over Visa's insistence that cardholders be given the option  when screening customers, including card validation
            of authorizing transactions with PINs or signatures. Wal-Mart     and customer lists. Many also conduct manual reviews:
            wants to mandate PIN authorization.                               86 percent of North American businesses, on average,
                                                                              perform manual reviews on 29 percent of orders, according
            A new report from Aite raises questions about the value of PIN    to CyberSource. The cost: 46 percent of those surveyed
            authorization, however. Aite found that although the cost for     said manual review staffs are the biggest line items in
            merchants with PIN pads is minimal, the economic impact           their fraud management budgets.
            would be huge – in excess of $4 billion – because there are so
            many merchants without PIN pads. Issuer costs would exceed        CyberSource, which is owned by Visa Inc., is one in
            $2.6 billion, and include card re-issuance, establishing and      a growing army of companies that leverage data and
            maintaining PIN management systems, customer education            analytics to help CNP merchants accept more good orders,
            and platform modification.                                        which by extension, is intended to enhance the customer
                                                                              experience. It's a tall order. "We're dealing with teams of
            The end result, by Aite's estimates, would be a five-year fraud-  fraudsters working in global groups," O'Neil said. "They
            avoidance benefit of about $850 million. What's more, the         can leverage vast amounts of computational power, and
            most effective use of PINs is to counteract lost and stolen card  they are gaining access to huge amounts of data."
            fraud, which only accounts for about 9 percent of total card
            fraud losses, Aite reported in Chip Cards in the United States:   Most experts believe the best fraud-fighting strategies
            The PIN, PINless, Debit, Credit Conundrum.                        demand a combination of solutions implemented by
                                                                              merchants and issuers, alike. This also makes for good
            "With very little incremental risk for merchants and significant  customer service; 75 percent of consumers surveyed
            expense and implementation challenges for the payments            by Tender Armor and Sparks said they wanted more
            ecosystem, it is difficult to justify a mandate to implement PIN  protection for card data when shopping online. "It's a huge
            as a credit card verification method," said Aite Senior Analyst   worry for consumers," Aufseeser said.
            Thad Peterson.
                                                                              In 2015, Tender Armor introduced a real-time, dual-factor
"The challenge remains, how do businesses accurately                          tool for authenticating cardholders in CNP transactions.
identify genuine attacks from legitimate transactions?"                       Aufseeser described the product, CvvPlus, as a "one of
Pandey said.                                                                  a kind solution" that enables issuers to stop all types of
                                                                              CNP fraud (not just online, MO/TO and mobile fraud).
ThreatMetrix developed a solution it calls Digital Identity                   Plus there's no need for retrofitting; the solution can be
Network to help identify potential fraud resulting from                       deployed on any and all credit and debit cards, she said.
malware and data breaches. The company said it verifies
20 billion transactions annually for 30,000 websites                          CvvPlus uses two sources of data to authenticate
globally. It uses data from those transactions for regular                    cardholders: the card number and a unique security code
cybercrime reports. The latest of those reports, covering                     the cardholder retrieves from a mobile text message or
the second quarter of 2016, reveals the network detected                      email and provides the merchant in lieu of the payment
                                                                              card's CVV2 code. The codes can be changed as often as
                                                                              daily and can be used for multiple cards in a consumer's
                                                                              wallet. Consumers sign up for CvvPlus through card-
                                                                              issuing banks, many of which have shown interest in the
                                                                              concept. "We've got a huge sales pipeline," Aufseeser said.

                                                                              Unlike CvvPlus, many CNP fraud tools have been
                                                                              developed for and implemented by merchants, and the
                                                                              move to EMV has more merchants looking closely at
                                                                              these and emerging tools. Here's a rundown of the most
                                                                              commonly used CNP tools:

40
   35   36   37   38   39   40   41   42   43   44   45