Page 41 - GS170701
P. 41

CoverStory




        Martaus pointed to Mastercard and Visa moving from      A 2015 survey of merchants by the Federal Reserve Bank of
        bankcard associations to publicly traded companies (2006   Richmond found that most (75 percent) of merchants had
        and 2008, respectively) as a turning point for interchange   not reduced product prices after the Durbin Amendment
        pricing. "Prior to that, the boards were made up of [card]   caps took effect, and 22 percent raised prices. That same
        issuers, and increases in interchange were intended as   study also revealed that a significant share of merchants
        incentives for them to issue more cards," Martaus said.   specializing in small-ticket items (about 25 percent) saw
        "When they [Visa and Mastercard] went public they lost   interchange costs rise. Many of these merchants had
        the bank influence, but they kept doing things that way."  sweetheart deals pre-Durbin under which they paid less
                                                                than $0.21 per debit card transaction, the study noted, but
        The IPOs occurred in a climate of vigorous public debate   those deals were largely scrapped after the cap went into
        over interchange that included Wal-Mart Stores Inc. and   effect.
        millions of other merchants suing Visa and Mastercard for
        allegedly conspiring to fix interchange rates in violation of   All of these changes have created problems while also
        federal anti-trust laws.                                presenting new opportunities for acquirers and their sales
                                                                partners. POS terminals, once considered cash cows, don't
        A settlement was reached that included cash payouts to   generate much income anymore. "A lot of ISOs cut their
        retailers and allowed retailers to surcharge card payments.   teeth in this business leasing terminals," Holman said. The
        Former U.S. District Judge John Gleeson, the presiding   total of monthly lease payments typically far exceeded
        judge in the case, expressed hope that the settlement   the cost of the devices. As interchange evolved and
        agreement would unleash a competitive spirit in the     became more complex, however, most ISOs discarded that
        bankcard market by permitting credit card surcharging   practice, Holman added. The emergence of free terminal
        at both the brand level (that is, Visa or Mastercard) and   deployments further eroded lease revenues.
        product level (that is, different kinds of cards, such as
        consumer cards, commercial cards and premium cards).    Now the trend is toward winning contracts with new
                                                                pricing models created around interchange. "Early on,
        Acknowledging limitations of law, Gleeson said the court   everything was a race to the bottom; everyone just kept
        could only provide relief from anticompetitive business   lowering rates," noted Anne Mellin, Division Sales
        practices, and "cannot regulate interchange fees or enjoin   Director at Beyond. "Then all of a  sudden they started
        nonparties or preempt state laws or reform network rules   padding [prices], adding fees all over the place."
        that do not violate the antitrust laws." The final outcome
        of that case is still in limbo, however. An appeals court   Wells Fargo Merchant Services, for example, recently began
        scrapped the settlement in 2016, after thousands of     charging an "interchange clearing fee" over and above its
        retailers claimed the agreement banned them from future   standard interchange-plus pricing for transactions that
        litigation involving interchange and related rules. In early   don't qualify for its base markup under that pricing model.
        2017, the U.S. Supreme Court declined a request to review   The move has been controversial. "We've seen the charge
        the appeals court's decision.                           for the interchange clearing fee range from 0.25 percent to
                                                                0.50 percent, but Wells is able to charge whatever it wants,
        Lawmakers entered the fray over interchange in 2010.    so I assume it has been assessed at percentages outside this
        Responding to vocal retailer lobbying, Congress added   range," Ben Dwyer, Chief Executive Officer at CardFellow
        the Durbin Amendment to the Dodd-Frank Act, which       LLC, recently blogged.
        instructed the Federal Reserve Board to regulate debit
        card interchange. The Fed imposed a cap ($0.21 to $0.24   Interchange-plus is one of several pricing models
        per transaction) that primarily applies to large issuers of   employed by acquirers and ISOs that effectively form the
        signature- and PIN-authorized transactions.             basis for calculating overall merchant discount rates. The
                                                                next installment of this series will explain these different
        In a May 1, 2017, op-ed piece published in  Morning     pricing models and examine how ISOs and merchant level
        Consult, executives from leading bank and credit union   salespeople are taking these models into the marketplace.
        trade associations claimed the cap, to date, has siphoned
        upwards of $42 billion in interchange revenues from bank   Editor's note: Interchange is unique to bankcards – credit and debit cards
        and credit union issuers of debit cards.
                                                                issued by banks and credit unions that carry Visa and MasterCard logos.
        New market realities                                    We reached out to Visa and Mastercard requesting interviews for this
                                                                report. Both companies declined.
        Apparently, much of that money was pocketed by retailers,
        particularly those specializing in large-ticket items –
        despite assurances that reprieves on interchange would
        result in lower consumer purchase prices.





                                                                                                                41
   36   37   38   39   40   41   42   43   44   45   46