Page 32 - GS180401
P. 32

Education



                             StreetSmarts                                                  SM






                                                                                               Steve Feldshuh




                                             “Talk To Steve”












                               New merchant fees – who


                             plays dirty, who plays fair?






        By Steven Feldshuh                                       why they would like to put through increases. Think of
        Merchants' Choice Payment Solutions East                 the costs of developing new programs that may or may
                                                                 not prove to be good investments. We, as a sales office,
                  ecently, GS Online's MLS Forum was lit up      always want more. Whether, it is more products, better
                  with discussions  about  processors and gate-  cost structures or freebies, we want it.
                  ways pushing through fees that were not part
        R of the schedule of expenses in agents' con-            But putting through well-thought-out increases, based on
        tracts. It seems to be a hot button that should be opened   a value proposition such as increasing a Payment Card
        up and discussed.                                        Industry security standards compliance fee while also
                                                                 increasing compliance services or increasing the cost of
        No one really wants to push additional fees onto         online access, but giving a program providing analytics,
        merchants. The one thing we all know is merchants do     to me, are fair increases. So that brings us to what the
        not like receiving letters announcing cost increases. I   discussions in the MLS Forum are about. You can be the
        feel extremely fortunate in that my processor doesn't put   judge of whether certain increases are fair or not.
        through any increase unless it is agreed upon beforehand   Watch out for questionable moves
        in  the  office  ‒  with  a  revenue  share.  The  people  at  our
        processor understand the integrity of their contract with   One forum member mentioned that a well-known, large
        us.                                                      processor put through a new $299 EMV annual fee. That
        Take care, add value                                     is almost $25 a month, which seems to be excessive and
                                                                 has gotten a lot of negative feedback. I can assure you if
        The question is, though, how should processors deal      my office ever had that fee put through, I would see an
        with the continued increased costs they face. As a small   uprising from our sales agents. One hundred percent of
        business  owner  located  in New  York  City,  my  costs  of   them would be against such an attrition-causing cost. I
        doing business continue to increase. Even with efficiencies,   would guess that we would receive countless complaints
        the human cost of wages, health insurance, rent and so   from merchants, and those that didn't call would say,
        forth continue to increase every year. My landlord isn't   enough is enough and just leave.
        concerned about my situation, nor is the business health
        insurance provider.                                      Another comment on the forum was from a sales office that
                                                                 received a 6-basis-point increase on a gateway expense.
        Obviously, to keep great employees, one must continue    As far as I know, none of the gateways I have ever worked
        to  take  care  of  them.  Add  to  that  the  costs  processors   with have had a discount charge. They typically have a
        have with boarding, risk, tech support, customer service,   monthly fee, and sometimes an additional transaction fee.
        compliance, legal and losses from risk, one can understand
        32
   27   28   29   30   31   32   33   34   35   36   37