Page 36 - GS191101
P. 36

Education




                                                                Let's imagine the merchant gives the MLS an ultimatum:
                                                                either find me another processing home, or I'll go
                                                                elsewhere. This would be to the loss of both ISO and agent.
                                                                Imagine the MLS makes a final attempt to inspire the ISO
                                                                to serve the merchant properly, to no avail. The agent then
                                                                takes the merchant elsewhere – in technical violation of
                                                                the merchant agreement.

                          Legal ease:                           Imagine the ISO takes the same action against this agent
                                                                as it did against the MLS in the earlier example, in which
                                                                the agent, in bad faith, moved a substantial quantity of
                                                                merchants in blatant violation of their agreement – with
                                                                no excuses. In the second case, the ISO may, technically, be
                                                                able to get away with claiming damages against the good
                                                                faith, well-meaning agent, but remember, the merchant is
                                                                gone, and this is a collection mission that is unlikely to
                                                                generate any real benefit for the ISO.
        Legal strategies of                                     What's more, other agents observing the ISO's aggressive

                                                                stance will be put off and less motivated to board new
        successful ISOs                                         merchants or work with the ISO to solve issues pertaining
                                                                to merchants needing better service. In short, this
        By Adam Atlas                                           aggressive position by the ISO may do more harm to its
                                                                business than one that is more flexible and understanding
        Attorney at Law                                         of the merchant's real needs.

                   aving had the privilege of advising ISOs over   Then, there are the cases of extreme aggression. Here, an
                   a number of years, I've been able to observe   ISO pursues an MLS who has committed a minor technical
                   strategies taken by ISOs facing various legal   infraction and has no assets. The aggressive ISO often
        H issues. New clients sometimes ask how my              cites this type of wasteful claim as being necessary to
        best clients have achieved their aims. In this article, I will   prove a point or make an example of the agent. More often
        focus on a few legal strategies adopted by some of my   than not, this kind of aggression injects fear into the ISO's
        firm's most successful clients.                         relationships with other MLSs – fear that could poison the
                                                                long-term mutual trust required to build the best business
        1. Aggressive versus passive in legal claims            relationships.
        Here, the winners find a perfect balance between
        aggressive and passive actions. When, objectively, an   Note that very aggressive ISOs spend a significant amount
        ISO has been wronged, such as an agent's unambiguous,   of money on lawyers, so I suppose there could be a silver
        wrongful and substantial solicitation of its merchants, and   lining for me in cases involving aggressive ISOs (just
        the ISO is likely to recover something from the agent, then   kidding). On a serious note, my team does not support any
        winning ISOs have taken aggressive positions.           party in futile or excessively aggressive claims, as we do
                                                                not believe that to be a good use of client money or the
        Being aggressive in this context means reviewing the    time of our lawyers.
        terms of the applicable agent agreement and enforcing   2. W-2 employees versus 1
        them. Such enforcement starts with sending a cease and   099 independent contractors
        desist notice, perhaps clawing back payment of residuals,
        and can rise to taking action before a court or arbitrator to   As readers will know, the two most common ways to
        recover losses caused by the agent.                     engage agents are as employees (for which a W-2 tax form
                                                                is filed) or as independent contractors (for which a 1099
        But what about ISOs that are too aggressive? An example   form is filed). Key differences exist between these two
        would be when a merchant level salesperson (MLS) has    types of relationships.
        a merchant who was entirely displeased with the ISO's
        service, the services of the ISO are not compatible with the   In short, employees are obligated to follow ISO instructions
        needs of the merchant, the merchant has complained to the   that set the parameters of their work tasks, productivity,
        ISO about the situation, and the agent has also advocated   schedule, etc., and are entitled to employer and government
        for better service for the merchant from the ISO – but the   benefits, such as minimum wage, that go along with being
        ISO has not delivered.                                  an employee. Independent contractors do not enjoy the



        36
   31   32   33   34   35   36   37   38   39   40   41