Page 26 - GS201001
P. 26

Education





                                                                allow their lawyers enough time to give their contracts the
                                                                attention they deserve.

                          Legal ease:                           Lawyers, of course, have to pick up the pace and get the
                                                                work done without delay. The rush by everyone brings a
                                                                degree of excitement, but also takes a toll on quality.
                                                                Big processors do the right thing, or not
        Legal culture                                           Large payment processors used to rely on their reputations

                                                                as adroit and honest companies. Previously, when ISOs
        in payments                                             trusted in processors to pay them correctly and for the
                                                                right period of time, large processors often said, "We are
                                                                [fill in the name], and we would never do the wrong thing."
        By Adam Atlas                                           This is not true anymore.
        Attorney at Law                                         Large processors are under never-ending demand for
                                                                profit, and some have significant debt to service. Whether
                  fish rots from the head down. The same is true   out of necessity or greed, large processors have sharpened
                  in business, so the saying goes. Most compa-  their pencils and are ready to take more from ISOs than
                  nies have a corporate culture, and that culture   before in negotiations, subtle contract wording or self-
        A is present not only in business relations, but        serving interpretation of language during the course of a
        also in legal work. This shares several telling observa-  contract.
        tions about contemporary legal culture in the payments
        industry.                                               Recently, an ISO was selling their portfolio. Their key
        Take it or leave it                                     ISO agreement required prior consent of the processor
                                                                for assignment of the agreement, which was necessary
        More than ever, my colleagues and I are working opposite   to complete the transaction. The processor agreed in the
        payments counsel inside large payment processors and    wording of the agreement that consent for assignment
        other platforms that have a take-it-or-leave-it approach   would not be unreasonably withheld, delayed or
        to contract negotiation. It's hard to pin the blame for this   conditioned.
        on one cause, but there are a handful of obvious sources.
        First, in-house legal counsel are under ever-more pressure   We weren't expecting any problems. How wrong we were.
        to turn documents quickly in support of their internal   The processor unreasonably delayed and conditioned the
        business clients. This makes it harder for them to engage   consent, causing considerable difficulty to our client. With
        in productive negotiation, which can be time-consuming.  a different culture, this would not happen.

        Second, numerous products and services these days are   The takeaway here is that brands are not what they
        procured on a take-it-or-leave-it basis. We don't negotiate   used to be. The Wirecard insolvency and other scandals
        with app developers when installing or uninstalling     are additional proof that we must not judge a payments
        apps on our phone. This binary approach to business     company by their reputation or size alone.
        relationships is present in payments, too, to the detriment
        of meaningful negotiations between parties.             Simple is better
                                                                On the bright side, professionals are tending to use simpler
        Third, more complex models may prevent adjustments to   language in legal drafting. Naturally, some concepts
        key concepts. Payment processors, DDA-account program
        managers, prepaid issuing program managers and other,   require a degree of complexity to be properly framed in
                                                                law. However, wordy agreements of yesteryear are fading
        increasingly complex providers are subject to specific
        constraints from payment networks, government and also   away, making room for writing that is easier to understand
                                                                (though harder to write).
        sponsoring banks, all of which reduce the ability to be
        flexible in contract negotiations. When negotiating opposite   What's in your culture? You might see the answer in how
        a regulated entity, respect their legal requirements, but do
        not let them use regulation as an excuse to steamroll your   your lawyer represents you.
        concerns.
                                                                In publishing The Green Sheet, neither the author nor the publisher is
        Now is too late                                         engaged in rendering legal, accounting, or other professional services.

        Contemporary payments providers (like other businesses)   If legal advice or other expert assistance is required, the services of a
        are  eager  to eliminate  all  delays  to  going  live.  Legal   competent professional should be sought. For further information on
        review, which always takes time, can cause delays that are   this article, please contact Adam Atlas, Attorney at Law by email at
        never welcome. The challenge is for payments providers to   atlas@adamatlas.com or by phone at 514-842-0886.
        26
   21   22   23   24   25   26   27   28   29   30   31