Page 18 - GS230801
P. 18

Views



                              Payments, a retrospective
                              Payments, a retrospectiv
                                                                                                  e




                                                                by a leg, and banks and their partners represented by the
          Insider’sreport                                       third leg. For stability the stool needs the support of all
                                                                three legs, and already at least one of the legs is wobbly.
            on payments
                                                                Some  folks  blame the situation  on  lawyers;  after  all,
                                                                there's a lot of fee income to be had from multibillion-
                                                                dollar settlements. But the card associations (MasterCard
                                                                and Visa) and the banks that originally owned them are
        The assault on                                          culpable too.

        interchange widens                                      By settling the so-called WalMart lawsuit out of court in
                                                                2003, MasterCard and Visa in effect declared open season
                                                                on interchange. (Despite its moniker, the WalMart suit was
                                                                a class action that included thousands of merchants. Under
        By Patti Murphy                                         the settlement MasterCard and Visa agreed, among other
                                                                things, to create funds for multibillion-dollar distributions
        [Editor's note: As part of our retrospective series, we are reprinting Patti   to merchants for past overcharges.)
        Murphy's column addressing early assaults on interchange, published
        Oct. 22, 2007, in issue 07:10:02.]                      What's going on?
              nterchange is under attack in Washington … again.   The latest attack against interchange comes from the
              Is anybody surprised? I'm not. Ganging up on      Merchant Payments Coalition (MPC), a confederation of
              big business has become a sport for some folks in   groups representing various categories of merchants and
        I Washington, and we are heading into an election       other card-accepting businesses; members are said to
        year. The latest salvos: new complaints from merchants   represent 2.7 million stores employing some 50 million
        about MasterCard and Visa, and word that the Department   Americans.
        of Justice is investigating interchange.
                                                                In a letter to the House Judiciary Committee's Anti-Trust
        Surely there are other businesses picking the pockets of   Task  Force,  the  MPC  accused  Visa  and  MasterCard  of
        Americans, you may be saying  to yourself, why all the   obfuscations – muddying the pool of public knowledge
        jawboning over interchange?                             about interchange during a hearing the panel held in July.

        The truth is that taking down interchange is an issue that   The MPC argued during those hearings that the way
        ostensibly puts money back into merchants' tills, and small   MasterCard and Visa set interchange rates constitute a
        businesses (like retail merchants) are the backbone of the   violation of federal antitrust laws primarily because the
        economy and of the electorate. What congressman doesn't   associations are owned by banks. Recent efforts to take the
        want to support a plan that can be construed as saving their   associations public and diversify ownership should temper
        constituents millions or even billions of dollars without   those concerns. But it may not be enough.
        costing Uncle Sam a penny?
                                                                The Justice Department apparently is taking another
        Of course, the money has to come from somewhere, and in   look at MasterCard and Visa. The National Association
        the case of interchange it comes from the feet on the street,   of Convenience Stores (NACS) reports that a key Justice
        themselves small business owners. But a lot of people   Department official told lawmakers during a hearing in
        don't see things that way. Heck, how many of the folks   September  that  the  agency's  antitrust  division  is  looking
        we socialize with (outside our work lives) have any idea   into interchange. Thomas Barnett, the assistant attorney
        of what it really is that we do to earn our living? Multiply   general in charge of that division is reported to have said
        that number by millions of Americans and you start to   that the investigation is "comprehensive" and "will take
        get a sense for how huge a task it is to counter attacks on   some time."
        interchange.
                                                                It wouldn't be the first time federal antitrust lawyers
        And let's be clear, the campaign against interchange is not   have set their sights on Visa and MasterCard. The Justice
        just a war of words. It's an attack on the economic model   Department took the two organizations to court in 1998.
        that has driven broad-based acceptance of payment cards   Three years later, in a win for the government, a federal
        among both businesses and consumers.                    court struck down association rules that precluded member
                                                                banks from also issuing non-bank cards (like American
        Here's a visual: the card business model as a three-legged   Express and Discover), and three years after that (in 2004)
        stool, with merchants and  cardholders each  represented
        18
   13   14   15   16   17   18   19   20   21   22   23