By Roger Alexander
Chargebacks911
Imagine reviewing your bank statement and noticing a charge that doesn’t ring a bell. It’s not from your favorite coffee shop or a streaming service, but a strange, unidentified merchant with an unrecognizable string of letters and numbers. The amount taken is significant, leaving you questioning if you’ve fallen victim to fraud. For most, the first instinct would be to reach out to their bank to dispute the transaction. And it’s understandable—cybercrime is estimated to cost the UK alone a staggering £27 billion (US$34.01 billion) each year, a figure that continues to rise.
While many imagine digital theft as direct hacking, payment fraud is often far more subtle: through deceptive means like phishing or sending cardholders to fake websites, where sensitive details are taken and misused on genuine sites or manipulated into fake purchases.
When a transaction that a consumer doesn’t recognize appears on a statement, even if it's legitimate, it often triggers unnecessary chargebacks. Chargebacks911’s Cardholder Dispute Index reveals that 58 percent of consumers find their statements unclear, and nearly 20 percent report this confusion frequently. Over half (53 percent) of consumers have initiated a dispute without first reaching out to the merchant—a response driven by a lack of clarity on whom to contact.
This confusion is frequently caused by unclear merchant descriptors on statements. Often, transaction descriptions appear as cryptic codes or names unfamiliar to the customer, such as an obscure series of letters and numbers or the parent company’s name rather than the brand the consumer recognizes. For instance, a purchase from a well-known online store might appear under the name of a holding company, causing unnecessary alarm and prompting disputes that could have been avoided with clearer descriptors.
When customers misinterpret a transaction as fraud, they often initiate a chargeback—a process in which the consumer’s bank forcibly reclaims funds from the merchant. Though designed to safeguard consumers, this system comes at a high cost to businesses. Firstly, chargebacks directly impact merchants’ revenue. Not only do they forfeit the sale itself, but they also incur a chargeback fee, which can range from £15 (US$18.89) to £100 (US$125.96) per dispute, depending on their payment processing agreements.
Accumulated fees from frequent chargebacks can significantly erode a business's profit margins, especially for those dealing with recurring payments. A high chargeback rate also drives up a business's processing fees and, in severe cases, can jeopardize its ability to accept card payments. For online businesses, losing credit card processing privileges can be particularly damaging, limiting sales opportunities and customer reach. Beyond these financial effects, chargebacks also take a toll on reputation.
Consumers who mistakenly file disputes may leave with a lasting negative impression, associating the business with unclear communication or even perceived deception. Over time, this can diminish customer loyalty and harm brand perception, as customers may turn to competitors for a smoother experience.
While consumers may sometimes initiate chargebacks hastily, the responsibility often lies with merchants to ensure clear communication, especially for those doing business online, where checkout experiences may be less impressionable and more likely to be forgotten. When customers don’t receive an immediate receipt or confirmation of the purchase, these inconsistencies can lead to confusion that may quickly escalate into disputes.To avoid these issues, merchants should adopt clear, recognizable descriptors and streamline their billing communications, providing transparency from the moment of purchase to the statement line.
To minimize transaction confusion and reduce the risk of chargebacks, merchants can focus on clearer communication with customers through these strategies:
As digital payments become more integral to everyday transactions, clarity in payment information has never been more crucial. With consumers moving rapidly toward online and digital purchases, merchants who prioritize transparency can not only avoid unnecessary chargebacks, but also strengthen their relationships with customers.
Clear communication is no longer a luxury; it's essential for business resilience. By addressing common points of transaction confusion, merchants not only protect their earnings, but also create a smoother, more trustworthy experience for customers, laying the groundwork for lasting loyalty in an increasingly digital market. 
Roger Alexander serves as a key adviser to Chargebacks911’s Advisory Board and its CEO, Monica Eaton, assisting the company with its expansion initiatives, including the highly-anticipated launch of its dispute resolution solution set to address the record spike of authorized push payment (APP) fraud claims. Alexander has previously served in various leadership roles within the payments and financial services sectors, including directorial roles at Barclays and subsequently as the CEO of Switch (the UK’s debit card) and president of Elavon Merchant Services Europe. He is currently a strategic advisor for Tarci and Pennies, a major UK charity. To learn more, visit: https://chargebacks911.com. Contact Roger Alexander via LinkedIn at https://www.linkedin.com/in/alexanderroger/
The Green Sheet Inc. is now a proud affiliate of Bankcard Life, a premier community that provides industry-leading training and resources for payment professionals. Click here for more information.
Notice to readers: These are archived articles. Contact names or information may be out of date. We regret any inconvenience.
Prev Next
