Page 28 - GS181101
P. 28

Views





                                                                Those of you who regularly read my columns know I'm a
          Insider’sreport                                       champion of checks. My admiration for the check payment
                                                                system, however, isn't because I'm old school. (Although I
             on payments                                        am a baby boomer.) It has much more to do with the tech-
                                                                nology and other efficiencies that have been introduced to
                                                                the check system over the past few decades.
                                                                Thanks to the rise of image exchanges and remote deposit
                                                                capture (RDC), most checks today clear as electronic im-
                                                                ages – better than 99 percent, by the Fed's reckoning. As a
                                                                result they clear faster than ever before – usually in a day
        Electronic payments                                     or two, and it's not unheard for RDC or mobile RDC depos-
                                                                its to clear on a same-day basis. This, in turn, allows banks
        grow, as do fraud rates                                 to identify fraudulent items before having to make deposits
                                                                available for withdrawal.

        By Patti Murphy                                         The impact of those changes on check fraud has been no-
                                                                table: in 2015 banks sustained $710 million in check fraud
        ProScribes Inc.                                         losses, down from $1.1 billion in 2012. In 2012 check fraud
                                                                made up 2.8 percent of all fraudulent noncash transactions
                 lectronic payments are growing at a rapid clip;   and 18.2 percent of total dollars lost. By 2015 checks ac-
                 so, too, is electronic payments fraud. These are   counted for just 0.9 percent of all fraudulent noncash pay-
                 two key takeaways from a new report from the   ments and 8.6 percent of total dollars lost to fraud, accord-
        E Federal Reserve Board. While data in the report       ing to the Fed's latest analysis.
        may be dated, the trends seem clear.
                                                                Another factor contributing to falling check fraud losses
        The report, which draws on data from the Federal Reserve   is that while consumer check writing is down, businesses
        Payments Study, reveals that between 2012 and 2015 total   continue to write a lot of checks, the Fed report noted. Busi-
        noncash payments grew by 12 percent, from $161.2 trillion   ness, particularly large companies, employ sophisticated
        to $180.3 trillion. Also during that three-year period, the   fraud detection tools (like positive pay) that allow them to
        total value of fraud involving noncash payments grew by   review checks presented to their banks for collection and
        37 percent, from $6.1 billion to $8.3 billion. And most of   proactively approve or reject them for payment.
        those losses were tied to debit and credit cards, according
        to Changes in U.S. Payments Fraud from 2012 to 2016: Evidence   ACH fraud and losses also tumbled between 2012 and 2015.
        from the Federal Reserve Payments Study.                ACH fraud, by value, fell from 17.2 percent of the total non-
                                                                cash fraud pie in 2012 to 14 percent in 2015. ACH fraud fell
        The Fed embarks on a massive data collection effort     from 5 percent of all noncash payment fraud in 2012 to 1.3
        every three years to gauge trends in noncash payments   percent in 2015.
        –  automated  clearing  house  (ACH),  cards  and  checks  –
        and publishes aggregate estimates in the Federal Reserve   Drilling down on card fraud
        Payments Study. The most recent study, published in 2016,
        draws on 2015 data provided by financial institutions.  Between 2012 and 2015, credit and debit card fraud grew,
                                                                both in terms of sheer number of incidents and total losses,
        In addition to the triennial study, the aggregate data also is   and individually each exceeded losses due to either ACH or
        used by economists and research analysts at the Fed Board   check fraud. Credit card fraud losses, alone, totaled more
        and  the  Reserve  Banks  to  preparing  reports  analyzing   than twice the combined value of ACH and check fraud
        payment trends. Changes in U.S. Payments Fraud from 2012   losses, the Fed said.
        to 2016: Evidence from the Federal Reserve Payments Study, the   The Fed's data, which reflects fraud experiences prior to the
        most recent of these reports, was released by the Fed Board   initial 2016 EMV liability shift, found the highest rates of
        in October.                                             credit card fraud in 2015 were in card-present transactions:
                                                                14.27 basis points by value of losses and 7.32 basis points
        Check, ACH frauds down                                  by  number of fraudulent transactions.  These  represent
                                                                increases of 5.34 basis points and 3.41 basis points,
        Overall, fraud involving noncash payments amounted to   respectively, over card-present fraud rates in 2012, the Fed
        an estimated 45 cents for every $10,000 in payments in 2015;   said.
        that was up from 38 cents per $10,000 three years earlier.
        And nearly all the losses came from card transactions. The   The EMV liability shift, which took hold for most merchant
        majority of good transactions (97.6 percent by value) were   categories in October 2016, has prompted a majority of brick-
        processed through the ACH and check systems, the report   and-mortar merchants to install EMV-compliant terminals
        revealed.                                               lest they be held liable for losses from fraudulent cards. The

        28
   23   24   25   26   27   28   29   30   31   32   33