Page 35 - GS170502
P. 35

Education





        the terms and conditions of a policy before accepting
        it. Further, any company involved in the payments in-
        dustry will find cyber insurance polices very difficult
        to attain because insurance carriers view the entire in-
        dustry as high risk. The best practice is to ensure your
        broker understands the payments industry and doesn't
        think PSP stands for Playstation.

        Underwriting, reserves, chargebacks
        The MAC show wouldn't have been a payments
        conference without discussion of acquirer chargeback
        liability. This risk can be mitigated by due diligence,
        reserves and rate. However, acquirers are now
        increasingly accepting insurance and  other financial
        products in lieu of loss reserves, reducing the financial
        burden on their processing channels while still
        maintaining underwriting integrity.

        Leveraging financial products and insurance is not
        only less costly; the revenue from additional capacity
        and verticals can also pay for the cost of the policy. In
        this scenario, freed up capital is now put to use, and
        letters of credit are no longer an issue, giving acquirers
        a further competitive edge without the additional
        exposure. A simple opportunity-cost calculation is to
        take the return on assets, or ROA, that is lost by being
        tied up in reserves that bear zero interest. By reducing
        or replacing the reserve requirement with insurance, it
        is easy to see how the cost is substantially less, and the
        insurance essentially pays for itself.
        CNP fraud

        Experts at the conference confirmed it is no surprise
        that card-not-present (CNP) fraud has and will
        continue to increase. Fortunately, many strong front-
        and back-end solutions can combat such losses. These
        solutions present partnership opportunities to add
        additional value to merchants by reducing losses from
        both friendly fraud and fraud perpetrated by outsiders.
        Coupling these solutions with an insurance-backed
        transaction guarantee could present a significant
        additional revenue source for acquirers.

        CNP merchants can already attain insurance that will
        pay losses stemming from fraudulent transactions.
        However, what would an additional 10 or 20 basis
        points in revenue on a CNP portfolio mean for an
        ISO or processor? While a strong front-end solution
        can reduce the risk, the revenue will be found in
        eliminating the risk for the merchant.
        Kevin Mendizabal, Director of Financial Institutions at Frates
        Insurance and Risk Management, specializes in the electronic
        payments industry. Prior to joining Frates, Kevin was part of the
        Financial Institution division at AIG. Previously, he held underwrit-
        ing and leadership roles in the mortgage banking sphere, as well
        as at Bank of America. Kevin has a degree in computer science from
        Rutgers University. You can reach him at kevin.mendizabal@frates-
        insurance.com or at 405-290-5610.
                                                                                                                35
   30   31   32   33   34   35   36   37   38   39   40